Lies Empowering International Criminal Reasoning

Justice can be described as a construct that often conceals falsehoods, or at times, serves merely as a façade for such falsehoods. Regardless of how justice may be defined, it is evident that it does not emanate from the intentions of virtuous individuals; rather, it is shaped by the artistry of those who are dishonest. This observation aptly reflects the current state of international criminal justice. It would not be an exaggeration to assert that the definition of international justice has been historically manipulated, dictated, and promoted by those who have held positions of power while engaging in egregious international crimes. Consequently, the concepts of injustice and the massacre of innocent civilians cannot be relegated to mere footnotes in the evolution of international relations among various civilisations; instead, they reveal the brutality inherent in our more powerful natures. Regrettably, the existing system of international criminal justice suffers from a significant distortion of truth and an overwhelming infusion of deception—perpetrated through coercive means within the discussions held at the United Nations Security Council. Thus, we find ourselves governed by a "law" founded on lies, which must be adhered to by all individuals regardless of their varying inclinations. It is imperative to engage with this discourse and remain cognisant of one's own nature.