Point of Failure

<div> <div> <div> <div> <p><em><span><span>Point of Failure</span></span></em><span><span>  is an innovative study that examines whether or how a select group of British Army officers – Brigadiers – survived two immediate strategic defeats due to their pre-war social, professional and military backgrounds and continued to serve and advance – or not – thereafter .</span></span></p> <p><span><span>By the early summer of 1940, the British Army had suffered two simultaneous strategic failures in Europe - in France & Belgium from May to June and in Norway from April to May.  </span></span><em><span><span>Point of Failure</span></span></em><span><span>  considers a specific set of British Army officers, Brigadiers, who served there. In 1940, while the rank of Brigadier existed, it was more a holding rank for an officer occupying a post temporarily to fill a role, after which he would either revert to Colonel or be advanced to Major General. Therefore, Brigadiers were, in a sense, the Army's 'middle management' – heading for the top or making no further progress. Point of Failure aims to examine this set of officers and to see whether their professional survival and/or advancement after 1940 was influenced by factors prevailing before it.</span></span></p> <p><span><span>Factors which may have contributed to the advancement of officers, be they professional, social or operational before 1940, are addressed. Also considered are those presumed to do so, but which this book shows were either ineffective or less influential than prior presumptions arising from the literature on the British Army in the Second World War, such as the influence of patronage by senior officers, most notably Bernard Montgomery and Alan Brooke.</span></span></p> <p><span><span>By its nature,  </span></span><em><span><span>Point of Failure</span></span></em><span><span>  draws considerably on secondary sources, such as campaign narratives, biographies and biographical sources. Primary sources, such as war diaries, personal papers, and autobiographies, are used but are subject to limitations. The main primary source, which would be profoundly informative on a personal level, namely officers' annual confidential reports throughout their careers, remain closed and inaccessible to researchers.</span></span></p> <p><span><span>To examine whether the factors discussed in this book prevailed or altered as a result of over three years of fighting, a later chapter compares those officers serving in fighting commands on D-Day and the initial stages of the Battle of Normandy in 1944 with their 1940 counterparts.</span></span></p> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div> </div>